Friday, January 16, 2009

The Wisdom of Finals?

With semester exams in full swing at my school, I have been rethinking the wisdom of finals. Ah, finals week: altered schedules, sharpened pencils stacked like cord wood, reams of scantrons, review sheets, kids frantically calculating—but not trig formulas—instead they are calculating how well they need to do on the final to get, or maintain a particular grade. (Are those students concerned with learning?)

My first question is this: What is the purpose of a final exam? I believe there is a theory and a sad reality to this. First the theory: A final exam can measure the cumulative growth of a student and evaluate the “total package” of what he has learned. Also if the final is a school-wide or district-wide final, it can measure how well the course is being taught, and whether or not students are meeting standards. In this respect, a final exam is a critical step in ensuring a guaranteed and viable curriculum.

The reality: One of three scenarios usually occurs: One, sometime in the last week of class a teacher frantically pieces together questions from previous unit tests and writes a smattering of questions based solely on her memory of the class. Two, the teacher is prescribed to give the “department assessment,” and spends the first ten minutes of the final period telling students which questions to skip because the topics weren’t covered. Finally, there is the “District Assessment” that teachers administer, scan the results, see that given the current scale, many would fail and “curve” the results to get their nice, neat bell curve.
Are these finals doing what we want them to do?

Writing a reliable, valid final examination is difficult work. Developing an assessment that measures all learning targets of a course can be done, but often isn’t. Also, the assessment needs to be written before the class commences (Wiggins, Understanding by Design) If it is created after, it tends to be “reactionary” as opposed prescriptive. One of my colleagues gives students the final on the first day of class, so they know what to expect. Kudos to her! Some may argue, “yes but then aren’t we just teaching to the test?” If the test accurately measures the targets of the class, then yes, we should absolutely be teaching to that test, BUT how often are tests that valid?

Standard final exams in high school usually represent something like 20% of the semester grade, which is equivalent to 4 ½ weeks of course work. Personally, I have a hard time quantifying this inequity.

We talk about the “student-centered classroom” “project-based learning” and “collaborative learning” yet our biggest assessment of the year is done in a timed, isolated setting with a student completing primarily recall questions in a passive, non-creative fashion.
Often times, the justification for administering final exams is to prepare students for college. If the theory is to give them practice at high-stakes tests, I think we have that covered even without finals. From the Iowa Test of Basic Skills all the way to SAT, ACT, and state NCLB requirements, students get more than their share of “big tests.”

Teachers may feel the need to administer a final because it’s “always been done” and may argue that in order to fully assess students, they need a “big” grade at the end. This gets me to my alternative solution. Instead of a timed final exam, I prefer a culminating “project” as the final assessment.. Here is an example of what I did in one class:
In my sophomore English class, I focused on the following skills:
• Literary analysis
• Text marking
• Inquiry-based research
• Proper documentation of sources
• Structured collaborative learning skills including writing
• On-line research skills

For the “final” project, study of Lord of the Flies I placed students in groups of three, and gave each group a particular “lens” for studying the novel. The students were to read, discuss, and research the book with an emphasis on that lens. Then they were to create a scholarly article (via a wiki) with an analysis of that lens or theme, and write two discussion/ analysis questions on that theme. For the last assessment, students read each others’ articles, and answered the questions posed by the students. They had all read the biook, but were only expert in one theme. This allowed them to learn from each other while mastering all the major foci of the book. I found this to be a much more valuable assessment tool for my students since it allowed them to display their skills in virtually everything we worked towards.
Most importantly, the project allowed students to demonstrate what they can do, not what they can’t.

I’m not sure all final exams do that.

(Photo courtesy of flickr contributor sashamd)


Sra. Amor8 said...

I also have concerns about final exams. We want our foreign language final to be cumulative, so that our students don't just memorize concepts for a quiz or test & then then quickly forget them. So in theory, a final will "make" students review the concepts taught over the semester, and reinforce them. However, a lot of our students play the numbers game. If a kid has 2 As, and they get a C on the exam they will still end up with a A. Or the kid who has one C can fail a quarter and an exam and still pass the course with a D. So some kids calculate what they can "blow off". I'm not sure that the bulk of my students really prepared that much for my finals, so our goal for the final was not really met.

Sra. Profe said...

I agree with everything you said, and with Sra. Amor8. This year our district decided to go with district-wide exams (just for the core courses, electives like Spanish -- which are not TAKS-tested -- are not "real" classes anyway, so why bother with them?) From what I understand, these exams were given to the teachers a two weeks before we were to give the exams. While I prefer the idea of district-wide exams (to have uniformity in the courses taught throughout the district and hold teachers accountable), I found it ridiculous that teachers were not given the exam until the semester was all but over.

I like your idea of a cumulative project (which measures learning much more effectively than multiple-guess tests do), but given the current set-up, there is no time to grade the "final" before semester grades are due, unless you made the project due the week before finals, and had the students work on something else during the 1.5 hour chunk of time when they should be testing. I would love to do that, but I'm afraid of what admin would say (because I would be "wasting" instructional time, not using those 1.5 hours of the exam). But I might try it next semester... we'll see how brave I feel.

Tareq Hasan said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Robert Linde said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
James Kateron said...

You have a website to communicate with your visitors. An effective site or blog successfully communicates with its target audience, it meets the needs of its visitors. What do you want to create with your website and why? homepage

James Kateron said...

A personal statement is a carefully crafted essay that offers you the opportunity to "sell" yourself by describing your best characteristics and strengths.this website